
To Measure Learning Impact for Competencies, First Define Specific Desired Behaviors Previously, I covered the importance of identifying the set of observable behaviors that would indicate successful application of a leadership development learning program. I also pointed out that these behaviors typically fall squarely between the traditional concerns of the Learning and Development organization (which focuses on the accomplishment of appropriate learning objectives) and the realm of Performance Management, which looks at sets of behaviors (often referred to as competencies). I concluded by saying that, unless specific desired behaviors resulting from participation in leadership development programs are clearly defined it is virtually impossible to measure the behavior and impact of these high visibility and typically expensive programs! To address this common deficiency I suggested that Learning and Development professionals should initiate discussions with Performance Management and senior organizational leaders to identify and define these behaviors as a component of each leadership development course or program. To illustrate this concept, I will explain this process of identifying and measuring some specific, intermediary, observable (Level 3) behaviors using an example from the Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) used by the U.S. government. (For more on the ECQs visit http://www.opm.gov/ses/recruitment/ecq.asp) Example: The Entrepreneurship Competency in the U.S. Government ECQs The ECQs consist of five essential qualifications that the U. S. Office of Personnel Management has defined, based on current research of effective leaders in successful organizations. The five ECQs are 1) Leading Change; 2) Leading People; 3) Results Driven; 4) Business Acumen; and 5) Building Coalitions. Each of the ECQs in turn consists of a set of competencies. Unfortunately for those seeking to measure the impact of learning programs, these competencies are … [Read more...]


























